Affirmative action in education has become a highly debated
topic recently. Affirmative action was started as a way to compensate for the
discrimination of minorities in education and employment. The idea behind it
was that even if minority groups have equal rights, past discrimination has
given them a disadvantage in preparedness for future opportunities.
Let’s start by taking a look at the history of affirmative
action.
In 1865, African Americans were officially freed from the
bonds of slavery by the Thirteenth Amendment; however their treatment would
remain unequal for nearly a century after that.
In 1955, President Dwight D. Eisenhower began a trend of
executive orders and acts that prohibited discrimination in federal employment.
In 1961, President John F. Kennedy coined the phrase
affirmative action in an executive order that stated that government
contractors “take affirmative action to ensure applicants are employed… without
regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin.” Although the phrase
was used in regards to government hired contractors, such a statement
summarized the general idea behind the order.
In 1964, President Lyndon B. Johnson passed the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 and another executive order which effectively banned discrimination of any sort (race, sex,
religion, etc.) in employment and publics services. He is quoted with saying, “You
do not take a person who, for years, has been hobbled by chains and liberate
him, bring him up to the starting line of a race and then say you are free to
compete with all others, and still just believe that you have been completely
fair.”
In 1971, the US Department of Labor issued guidelines that
attempted to properly represent minorities in the work force, especially in
government-sponsored programs.
And that brings us to the current status of affirmative action.
It finds itself applied to education and businesses across the nation often
seen under the term “equal opportunity establishment.”
Some of these organizations, especially schools, created a
quota to fill when it came to accepting minority applicants. During the early
years of affirmative action, this managed to get by under the idea of
compensating for past injustices. However in 1978 in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, a white student
sued the school claiming the quotas prevented more qualified students from
obtaining admission. The court found that using race as an admission factor was
acceptable and this convention was held until 2003. That year, the Supreme
Court found that affirmative action could no longer be justified as
compensation for the injustices of the past, but could still exist for schools
to maintain diversity.
People, often of the majority, find issues with affirmative
action as it treats minorities with special care only because they are of a
minority. In a way, such a program is a form of reverse discrimination. These
supporters believe that an applicant should be considered based on their merits
alone.
In light of this opinion, several states have banned
affirmative action to promote the equal treatment of all. As of 2008, these
states include California, Michigan, Washington, and Nebraska.
I look forward to reading your blog in the coming weeks. Affirmative action is a topic that is really relevant to all of us as college students and I am interested in hearing all the different sides of this issue. This was a great introduction post that gave a solid background.
ReplyDeleteI'll be honest, I didn't know much about affirmative action until reading this post. I like how you broke up your post into different years and explained what happened in each year. I look forward to your next post!
ReplyDeleteAffirmative action is such a hot topic issue - I'm very curious to see where the blog takes you. One thing I may suggest is to try and stay impartial. You've done well so far, but taking a side in the future could diminish your credibility. I'm also glad to see that you mentioned the Regents case. Look into Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger if you need some other cases to analyze in this framework.
ReplyDeleteI definitely remember seeing the Grutter case mentioned somewhere in my research. I'll be sure to dig deeper into the case in the later posts. Thanks for the suggestions!
DeleteAs college students we typically only hear about the part of AA that may put us at a disadvantage, but I look forward to hearing other points of view. On a side note, perhaps shy away from using terms like 'reverse discrimination', as it is just discrimination, regardless of who it is targeting.
ReplyDeleteI would certainly like to use the term less; however, "discrimination" has lost some of its meaning through the years. It has almost devolved into a black-white issue (which in reality is far from the truth) and as a result, people have had to specify the sort of discrimination that they are referring to. To be honest, I used the term because it was mentioned in some of the databases I used for research.
DeleteAffirmative action is a topic I'm certainly aware of, but I feel that it's an issue I should definitely become more informed of (like a bunch of these civic issues blogs!) So I'm looking forward to reading more from your blog. You took a very clean-cut historical approach of the topic, and I think it sets up well for an informative and lively blog for the coming weeks!
ReplyDeleteStarting out with an objective history of this controversial topic is a great way to begin your blog. I look forward to seeing more information about affirmative action as well as your own thoughts.
ReplyDeleteThis was a great way to launch your CI blog; the comprehensive timeline helped to catch your readers up to speed and establish a non-biased view of the topic. Affirmative action is really important for us all to understand, as individuals pursuing a college education it is very relevant, and we will soon be joining the professional world, where it could again meet us as a big issue.
ReplyDelete